LinkedIn Posts

Your employees: 2,500. Your non-human identities: 125,000+. Service accounts. AI agents. Automation bots. Cloud workloads. Most organisations have 50 non-human identities for every person on payroll. And the majority have no designated owner. That's not just an audit problem. Under NIS2 and DORA, it's a documented vulnerability — because when that service account gets compromised, nobody knows what it can reach. The question isn't whether you have an NHI problem. It's whether you know how bad it is. We built a 4-tier NHI classification model into RapidValue IGA — ownership coverage is a top-line KPI from day 1, not an afterthought. What does your NHI inventory look like today?

I talk to IAM teams every week who are 14 months into a SailPoint or Saviynt implementation. They still don't have their first useful drift report. That's not a vendor problem. That's an industry problem. The classic IGA model was designed for a world where: → IT had 12-month project budgets → Org structures were stable → You had a 6-person IAM team to maintain it None of those are true anymore. We built RapidValue IGA to deliver value in week 1. Not month 14. Quick Scan: point at your HR system + LDAP + one target system. 25 minutes later: role proposals and a drift report from your actual data. Identity governance shouldn't require a 6-figure implementation project.

Your IGA tool found 847 access violations. Great. Now your auditor asks: "Why did those exist?" Most IGA tools give you: a count. A delta. A timestamp. They do not give you: the reasoning. Why was this grant in scope? What policy put it there? What was the SOL and IST at the moment it was flagged? We built something different into RapidValue's reconciliation engine. Every run stores a per-grant snapshot: ✅ What the SOL said ✅ What the IST showed ✅ The human-readable reason ("In SOL via D-IT Finance Manager role; not found in Salesforce — provision needed") ✅ Timestamped, queryable, exportable Your auditor gets "why" alongside "what." That's the difference between compliance evidence and compliance theatre.

New hire. First day. Day 1: no AD account yet. Day 2: account created, no group memberships. Day 3: groups added, no Salesforce license. Day 4: Salesforce up, no SharePoint access. Day 5: fully productive. Maybe. This pattern costs mid-size enterprises €40,000+ per year in lost productivity — and that's before counting the manager hours chasing IT. We automated this. JML end-to-end: HR drives the trigger, connectors handle provisioning, manual-task queues cover the systems that don't have a connector yet (with ServiceNow/Jira integration). Time-to-productive for a new hire: from 5 days to 4 hours. That ROI pays for the platform in the first quarter. What does your current joiner flow look like?

Here's a question EU security teams keep asking: "We want SaaS convenience. But we can't send identity data to a US cloud." It's a genuine dilemma. Most IGA platforms are US-domiciled SaaS. Your employee names, org structure, entitlements — all of it goes to a US data centre. For regulated industries in Belgium, Netherlands, Germany: that's not always acceptable. GDPR is real. Data processing agreements have teeth. We solved this with tier-3 hybrid architecture. The agent runs inside your VPC. Your data never leaves your network. The SaaS control plane only sees task metadata and aggregate counts. You get: → Full SaaS operations experience (no infra to manage) → Zero identity data leaving your premises → GDPR-safe POC: run proof-of-concept with real data, no DPA needed EU-sovereign IGA. Without the on-prem maintenance nightmare.

"Here are your role mining results." Classic IGA output: 47 proposals. Actual situation: 7 of them are the same "D-IT Finance Manager" role, proposed once per algorithm per source system. Your IAM team now spends 3 hours deduplicating what should have been one proposal. We built cross-algorithm deduplication into RapidValue's mining engine. 8 algorithms run in parallel. Proposals that represent the same real-world role — same entitlement set, similar member cohort, overlapping source systems — get merged into one. What you get: "D-IT Finance Manager: 34 members, 7 entitlements, confirmed by RBAC + attribute mining + peer group analysis." What you don't get: 47 proposals and a spreadsheet. Role mining should give you insight. Not homework.

DORA enforcement started February 2025. NIS2 transposition deadline was October 2024. Both require continuous access oversight for critical functions and third-party services. Here's what "continuous" means in practice: → You can show, for any identity, what access they have and why → You can prove access was reviewed recently (not just annually) → You have timestamped evidence for every access decision Most organisations I talk to can do the first two on a good day. None of them can do the third — because their IGA tool doesn't store the reasoning, only the outcome. RapidValue stores both. Per grant. Per run. Permanently queryable. When your NIS2 auditor asks "prove this access was intentional" — the answer is already there.

"We'd love to evaluate it but we don't have 3 months for an RFP." I hear this every week. So we built a different motion. Morning call. Sales engineer shares screen. One command: rv-poc bootstrap "Acme Corp" Your agent is running in your VPC in 5 minutes. Connector wizard: 30 minutes, 75% pre-filled from live discovery. Role mining run: real proposals from your real data. Total time from "hello" to working proof: under 2 hours. You leave with: → A drift report from your environment → Role proposals with business-readable names → A privacy-safe take-home summary for your CISO No data processing agreement needed. No infrastructure to set up. No 3-month evaluation. Identity governance shouldn't require a procurement project just to see if it works.

For every IAM engineer who's ever had this nightmare: You're mid-migration. You've updated 400 role assignments. The provisioning engine fires. Chaos. Or: you've just discovered a critical role-model error. You need to stop everything while you investigate. But the engine keeps running. We built a kill-switch into RapidValue. One toggle. Globally pauses: → Provisioning → Reconciliation → Sync scheduling State persists across restarts. Your whole team sees it. With a mandatory reason field and timestamp in the audit log. It sounds simple. No other IGA platform has it. When things go wrong — and they always go wrong eventually — the first question is "can we stop the bleeding?" The answer should always be yes.

A simple test for your current IGA platform: Pick any access grant. Any identity. Any entitlement. Now answer these questions using only your IGA tool: 1. When was this grant last reviewed? 2. Who approved it? 3. What policy justifies it? 4. Was it in scope at the last reconciliation run? 5. Why was it in scope — what rule or role put it there? Most IGA tools answer 1–3 reasonably well. Almost none answer 4–5 in a queryable, auditor-ready format. That gap is where audit prep becomes a 200-hour manual exercise. That gap is where NIS2/DORA compliance becomes uncomfortable. That gap is what we closed. If your IGA can't answer question 5 at query time — without going to AD logs — you're carrying more audit risk than you think.